Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
Cochrane Review
4 SoF Entries
Summary of Findings
Key results and quality assessments using GRADE methodology
| Outcome | Effect | Participants | Studies | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
True positives (patients with early enamel caries)
Comparisons were made between transillumination devices. A separate review in this series investigates comparisons between transillumination?based tests and enhanced visual, radiograph, and fluorescence tests |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having early enamel caries)
Comparisons were made between transillumination devices. A separate review in this series investigates comparisons between transillumination?based tests and enhanced visual, radiograph, and fluorescence tests |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
True negatives (patients without early enamel caries)
Comparisons were made between transillumination devices. A separate review in this series investigates comparisons between transillumination?based tests and enhanced visual, radiograph, and fluorescence tests |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having early enamel caries)
Comparisons were made between transillumination devices. A separate review in this series investigates comparisons between transillumination?based tests and enhanced visual, radiograph, and fluorescence tests |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
GRADE Certainty of Evidence:
High
Very confident in the effect estimate
Moderate
Moderately confident in the effect estimate
Low
Limited confidence in the effect estimate
Very Low
Very little confidence in the effect estimate
Review Information
| Review ID: | CD013855 |
| Outcomes: | 4 assessed |
Related Content
Evidence Quality Distribution:
Not assessed:
4