Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
Cochrane Review
11 SoF Entries
Summary of Findings
Key results and quality assessments using GRADE methodology
| Outcome | Effect | Participants | Studies | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT)
Traditional technique |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Participant-reported quality of the denture - denture satisfaction
Traditional technique |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Number of border adjustments and sore spots after insertion of denture
Traditional technique |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Participant‐reported oral health‐related quality of life (OHIP‐EDENT)
Polysulfide rubber |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Participant‐reported quality of the denture
Polysulfide rubber |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Participant‐reported quality of the denture
Follow‐up: two weeks
Silicone |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Number of border adjustments and sore spots after insertion of denture
Follow‐up: two weeks
Silicone |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Participant-reported quality of the denture - general satisfaction
Two stage-two step elastomer |
0.0 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Participant-reported quality of the denture: general satisfaction
Two step-two stage with ZoE |
3.15 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Participant‐reported oral health‐related quality of life
One-piece cast |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Number of intaglio adjustments
One-piece cast |
1.43 | - | - | Not assessed |
GRADE Certainty of Evidence:
High
Very confident in the effect estimate
Moderate
Moderately confident in the effect estimate
Low
Limited confidence in the effect estimate
Very Low
Very little confidence in the effect estimate
Review Information
| Review ID: | CD012256 |
| Outcomes: | 11 assessed |
Related Content
Evidence Quality Distribution:
Not assessed:
11