Interventions for dry mouth and hyposalivation in Sjögren's syndrome
Interventions for dry mouth and hyposalivation in Sjögren's syndrome
Cochrane Review
9 SoF Entries
Summary of Findings
Key results and quality assessments using GRADE methodology
| Outcome | Effect | Participants | Studies | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Measures of clinical activity: mean percentage of 12- to 14-year-olds receiving fissure sealants for second permanent molars per dentist (weighted by number of children seen) – adjusted
No specific intervention |
9.8 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Measures of clinical activity: mean percentage of 12- to 14-year-olds receiving fissure sealants for second permanent molars per dentist (weighted by number of children seen) – unadjusted
No specific intervention |
7.1 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Healthcare costs: cost-effectiveness of fee-for-service vs. control (reported as the "% change in outcome per £[GBP]" – currency year NR)
No specific intervention |
0.1 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Measures of health service utilisation: mean number of visits per 0- to 15-year-old
Fee-for-service remuneration |
-0.4 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Patient outcomes: mean number of filled teeth per 0- to 15-year-old
Fee-for-service remuneration |
-0.18 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Patient outcomes: mean percentage of 0- to 15-year-olds having one or more teeth extracted
Fee-for-service remuneration |
-28.0 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Patient outcomes: mean number of decayed teeth per 14- to 15-year-old (data for 0- to 15-year-olds NR)
Fee-for-service remuneration |
0.16 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Measures of clinical activity: mean percentage of 0- to 15-year-olds receiving active preventive advice
Fee-for-service remuneration |
142.0 | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Healthcare costs: mean expenditure in GBP (currency year NR) per 0- to 15-year-old
Fee-for-service remuneration |
4.22 | - | - | Not assessed |
GRADE Certainty of Evidence:
High
Very confident in the effect estimate
Moderate
Moderately confident in the effect estimate
Low
Limited confidence in the effect estimate
Very Low
Very little confidence in the effect estimate
Review Information
| Review ID: | CD009853 |
| Outcomes: | 9 assessed |
Related Content
Evidence Quality Distribution:
Not assessed:
9