Different methods of posterior composite resin restorations
Different methods of posterior composite resin restorations
Cochrane Review
7 SoF Entries
Summary of Findings
Key results and quality assessments using GRADE methodology
| Outcome | Effect | Participants | Studies | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Success or failure of restoration using a defined criteria
Replacement of defective amalgam restoration (with amalgam) |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Further restoration required
Replacement of defective amalgam restoration (with amalgam) |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Presence of clinical symptoms (pain, swelling, diagnosis of pulpitis, abscess formation)
Replacement of defective amalgam restoration (with amalgam) |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Extraction of tooth (due to decay)
Replacement of defective amalgam restoration (with amalgam) |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Perioperative or postoperative pain or discomfort
Replacement of defective amalgam restoration (with amalgam) |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Patient satisfaction as measured by patient satisfaction or aesthetic scales
Replacement of defective amalgam restoration (with amalgam) |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
|
Adverse events
Replacement of defective amalgam restoration (with amalgam) |
nan | - | - | Not assessed |
GRADE Certainty of Evidence:
High
Very confident in the effect estimate
Moderate
Moderately confident in the effect estimate
Low
Limited confidence in the effect estimate
Very Low
Very little confidence in the effect estimate
Review Information
| Review ID: | CD005970 |
| Outcomes: | 7 assessed |
Related Content
Evidence Quality Distribution:
Not assessed:
7